Advertisement

The importance of overhydration in determining peritoneal dialysis technique failure and patient survival in anuric patients

The importance of overhydration in determining peritoneal dialysis technique failure and patient survival in anuric patients

Int J Artif Organs 2015; 38(11): 575 - 579

Article Type: ORIGINAL ARTICLE

DOI:10.5301/ijao.5000446

Authors

Fan, Stanley Davenport, Andrew

Abstract

Purpose

Loss of residual renal function (RRF) is associated with an increased risk for peritoneal dialysis (PD) technique failure and patient death. We wished to determine which factors were associated with PD technique failure and patient mortality once urine output had fallen to <100 mL/day.

Methods

We followed 183 PD patients who lost RRF and who had measurements taken at that time of PD small solute clearances, ultrafiltration volume, PD transport status and multiple frequency bioelectrical impedance assessments (MFBIA) of extracellular water (ECW).

Results

Results: 119 (65%) patients had PD technique failure or died during a median follow-up of 20.8 (10.5-36) months. This group had more men (58.8% vs. 31.9%, p = 0.011), and were older 57.9 ± 14.7 vs. 49.3 years (p = 0.002). These patients had a higher median C-reactive protein 5.5 [4.8-8.2] vs (5.0 [2-6] p = 0.013), and greater comorbidity (Davies grade 1 [0-1] vs. 0[0-1], p<0.001, and a higher ratio of ECW/TBW (0.45 ± 0.07 vs 0.42 ± 0.04, p<0.001). There were no differences in icodextrin usage, small solute clearance or ultrafiltration volumes. On multivariate Cox regression, ECW excess was significantly associated with PD technique failure and patient survival (β 1.09, p<0.001 and β1.17, p = 0.005), respectively.

Conclusions

Loss of urine output requires PD to provide both adequate solute clearances and volume control. We found that PD technique failure and patient death were associated with ECW excess. Prospective interventional studies are required to determine whether correction of volume status improves PD patient outcomes.

Article History

Disclosures

Financial support: None.
Conflict of interest: Dr. S. Fan has accepted monies from Fresenius for speaking engagements. Fresenius has provided educational grants to the Royal London & St. Bart’s Department of Renal Medicine, and has supported the UCL Centre for Nephrology Dialysis course.

This article is available as full text PDF.

  • If you are a Subscriber, please log in now.

  • Article price: Eur 36,00
  • You will be granted access to the article for 72 hours and you will be able to download any format (PDF or ePUB). The article will be available in your login area under "My PayPerView". You will need to register a new account (unless you already own an account with this journal), and you will be guided through our online shop. Online purchases are paid by Credit Card through PayPal.
  • If you are not a Subscriber you may:
  • Subscribe to this journal
  • Unlimited access to all our archives, 24 hour a day, every day of the week.

Authors

  • Fan, Stanley [PubMed] [Google Scholar] 1
  • Davenport, Andrew [PubMed] [Google Scholar] 2, * Corresponding Author ([email protected])

Affiliations

  • Department of Nephrology, Barts & the London NHS trust, Royal London Hospital, London - UK
  • UCL Centre for Nephrology, Royal Free Hospital, University College London Medical School, London - UK

Article usage statistics

The blue line displays unique views in the time frame indicated.
The yellow line displays unique downloads.
Views and downloads are counted only once per session.

No supplementary material is available for this article.