Advertisement

Evaluation of decellularized extracellular matrix of skeletal muscle for tissue engineering

Evaluation of decellularized extracellular matrix of skeletal muscle for tissue engineering

Int J Artif Organs 2014; 37(7): 546 - 555

Article Type: ORIGINAL ARTICLE

DOI:10.5301/ijao.5000344

Authors

Chih-Hsun Lin, Jenn-Rong Yang, Nai-Jung Chiang, Hsu Ma, Ruey-Yug Tsay

Abstract

Objective

We evaluated the effectiveness of enzyme-detergent methods on cell removal of mouse skeletal muscle tissue and assessed the biocompatibility of the decellularized tissues by an animal model.

Methods

The mouse latissimus dorsi (LD) muscles underwent decellularization with different enzyme-detergent mixtures (trypsin-Triton X-100, trypsin-sodium dodecyl sulfate (SDS), trypsin-Triton X-100-SDS). The effectiveness of decellularization was assessed by histology and DNA assay. The content in collagen and glycosaminoglycan was measured. The biomechanical property was evaluated in uniaxial tensile tests. For biocompatibility, the decellularized muscle specimens were implanted in situ and the tissue samples were retrieved at day 10, 20, and 30, to evaluate the host-graft inflammatory reaction.

Results

Extensive washing of the mouse LD muscles with an enzyme-detergent mixture (trypsin and Triton X-100) can yield an intact matrix devoid of cells, depleted of more than 93% nuclear component and exhibiting comparable biomechanical properties with native tissue. In addition, we observed increased infiltration of inflammatory cells into the scaffold initially, and the presence of M1 (CD68)-phenotype mononuclear cells 10 days after implantation, which decreased gradually until day 30.

Conclusions

The enzyme-detergent method can serve as an effective method for cell removal of mouse skeletal muscle. In short-term follow-up, the implanted scaffolds revealed mild inflammation with fibrotic tissue formation. The decellularized extracelluar matrix developed herein is shown to be feasible for further long-term study for detailed information about muscle regeneration, innervation, and angiogenesis in vivo.

Article History

Disclosures

Financial Support: None.

This article is available as full text PDF.

INTRODUCTION

Autologous muscle flaps, used to provide coverage of vital structures, play an important role in soft tissue reconstruction. However, the disadvantages of this treatment method include donor site availability and morbidity (1, 2). This reconstruction method cannot be performed for large defects in patients with massive soft tissue loss due to trauma, congenital deficiency, or tumor ablation. Tissue-engineered skeletal muscle has the potential to reduce donor-site morbidity and supply unlimited tissue for reconstructive surgery (3).

A major approach in tissue engineering of skeletal muscle involves the use of engineered matrices, with or without cell seeding, to support the growth and differentiation of myogenic cells (1-2-3). The engineered scaffolds are often produced from synthetic or natural materials, such as alginate (4), collagen (5, 6), and hyaluronan (7). The complex composition and microstructure of the extracellular matrix (ECM) of muscle cells makes it difficult to closely mimic the native cellular environment with an engineered matrix (8, 9).

The use of a decellularized ECM as a scaffold for the development of a tissue-engineered skeletal muscle has had some preliminary promising results and has gained much attention as an alternative to engineered scaffolds (1, 3). The concept of using a decellularized ECM as a scaffold in tissue engineering arises from the fact that tissue cells adapt to their surrounding microenvironment, and a better tissue response may be expected if a nearly “native” microenvironment is provided (1, 8-9-10). With its superior biocompatibility and tissue-guiding ability, decellularized ECM has been widely applied in the engineering of tissue substitutes for organs such as the bladder, urethra, trachea, heart valve, skin, and small intestine (10-11-12-13-14-15).

Liu et al used an acellular muscle graft, prepared using chemical methods, to repair an extended nerve defect in a rat model (16). Gamba et al used an acellular diaphragm matrix to repair an external oblique muscle defect of the abdominal wall in a rabbit model. However, they did not observe positive electromyography findings or myogenesis after 9, 40, and 90 days (2). Borschel et al cultured C2C12 myoblasts on a mouse extensor digitorum longus muscle acellular matrix in differential medium for three weeks, and observed cell-matrix integration with myofibril differentiation. Isometric force measurement showed a length-tension relationship (17, 18). Conconi’s group seeded cultured myoblasts on homologous acellular matrix. These myoblast-seeded patches were then transplanted to repair oblique abdominis muscles. The repaired tissue showed well-preserved muscle structure, abundant blood vessels and myoblasts, and single motor-unit potentials for approximately nine days. This cell-seeded matrix was also used to repair a full-thickness defect of the abdominal wall in female Lewis rats. The implants integrated with the host tissue and maintained their original dimensions for nine months (3, 19). Turner et al reported that a small intestinal submucosa (SIS) ECM scaffold implanted for six months in dogs at the site of gastrocnemius musculotendinous injury resulted in scaffold-localized tissue formation that exhibited the ability to contract in response to direct in vitro stimulation (20). Similar results were obtained with SIS implantation in a rodent with volumetric muscle injury of the abdominal wall in situ (21). Merritt et al reported that implantation of a decellularized muscle matrix alone did not facilitate functional recovery for up to 42 days post injury. However, injecting mesenchymal stem cells into the scaffold at seven days after the creation of the surgical defect resulted in 85% recovery of contralateral muscle force at 42 days (22). Moreover, Machingal et al indicated approximately 72% of tetanic force recovery at two months of follow-up in a rat latissimus dorsi (LD) muscle defect model after implantation of a porcine bladder acellular matrix-rat myoblast construct cultured in a bioreactor for 1 week (23). Daly et al developed a rabbit compartment syndrome model, and following implantation of porcine small intestine submucosa acellular matrix in situ, they noted gradual myogenesis and muscle regeneration after one to three months in rabbits that underwent fasciotomy (24).

Although the implantation of decellularized skeletal muscle is a promising method for muscle tissue reconstruction, the effectiveness of these implants varies (2, 19-20-21-22). The different methods applied for achieving decellularization are believed to be the main cause for this inconsistency. The decellularization process usually involves a series of different physical, chemical, and enzymatic treatments (25). However, these treatments may, to some extent, damage the ECM and alter its biochemical, mechanical, and structural properties.

Therefore, optimized decellularization protocols need to be developed according to specific requirements. Qing et al studied the optimized decellularization protocol using a rat skeletal muscle and suggested that oscillatory treatment of rat skeletal muscle at 4°C with 1% SDS for 72 h can yield acellular matrices with an intact ECM, complete removal of muscle fibers (26). Gillies et al demonstrated that using latrunculin B, hypertonic saline solution, and DNase I, can effectively decellularize the mouse tibialis anterior muscle without altering its ECM composition or mechanical properties (27).

In the present study, we investigated the effectiveness of enzyme-detergent methods for mouse skeletal muscle decellularization and the degree of decellularization was evaluated by histological and DNA assay. The scaffold characteristics were evaluated by scanning electric microscopy, biochemical assay, and biomechanical test. In addition, decellularized muscle matrix was implanted in situ in a mouse model and observed 10, 20, and 30 days after implantation to evaluate the inflammatory response and its biocompatibility.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

Harvesting and decellularization of mouse latissimus dorsi muscle

Male ICR mice (Institute cancer research, Bltw:CD1) aged 8 to 12 weeks were purchased from the Charles River laboratory (BioLASCO Taiwan, Taipei, Taiwan) for skeletal muscle decellularization. The mice were handled according to the guidelines of the Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee. Donor mice were anesthetized with Zoletil 50 (50 mg/kg, Virbac, Taipei, Taiwan), followed by skeletal muscle removal. The decellularization treatments were divided into four groups as shown in Table I. Agitation and rolling were performed during solution incubation to improve mixing of the enzyme or detergent. All specimens were then preserved in PBS at -20°C before examination and implantation.

SUMMARY OF DECELLULARIZATION PROTOCOLS

Group Treatment
*Triton X-100 and SDS solution were changed every 2 days.
B1 0.1% trypsin/0.01% EDTA 24 h
PBS wash with sonication 30 min
1% Triton X-100 1 week*
0.1% aprotinin/PBS wash 30 min with sonication
DNAase (50 U/ml)/RNAase (1 U/ml) in hypotonic buffer 3 h
PBS wash with sonication 30 min x 3 times
B2 The same as B1 except 1% Triton X-100 1 week replaced by 2 weeks*
C The same as B1 except 1% Triton X-100 replaced by 0.1% SDS*
D 0.1% trypsin/0.01% EDTA 24 h
PBS wash with sonication 30 min
0.1% SDS 1 week*
0.1% aprotinin/PBS wash 30 min with sonication
1% Triton X-100 1 week*
0.1% aprotinin/PBS wash 30 min with sonication
DNAase (50 U/ml)/RNAase (1 U/ml) in hypotonic buffer 3 h
PBS wash with sonication 30 min x 3 times

Histology

Muscle tissue was embedded in paraffin after being fixed in 10% buffered neutral formalin. Embedded tissue was sectioned at a thickness of 5 μm along the parallel or perpendicular direction of the fibers. Tissue staining with H&E and the modified VerHoff Van Gieson stain (EMS, Hatfield, PA, USA) was used to identify regions of collagen and elastin containing ECM, muscle fibers, and other cytoplasmic cells. Nuclei were stained with 4′,6-diamidino-2-phenylindole (DAPI) to assess the extent of cell removal.

DNA quantification

The DNA from either native or decellularized tissue samples of approximately 20-30 mg was isolated, purified, and rehydrated using the Wizard® Genomic DNA Purification Kit (Promega, Madison, WI, USA), according to the recommended protocol. Each assay was performed in triplicate.

Collagen assay

Total collagen content was determined using the Sircol Collagen Assay kit (Biocolor, Carrickfergus, UK). Briefly, about 20 mg of dry tissue sample were digested with 1 mL pepsin (0.1 mg/1 ml Pepsin, 0.5 M Acetic acid, pH 2) and placed at 4˚C overnight. Digested samples were then assayed following the manufacturer’s protocol. Each assay was performed in triplicate.

Glycosaminoglycan assay

Glycosaminoglycan (GAG) concentrations were measured using the Blyscan Sulfated Glycosaminoglycan Assay Kit (Biocolor Ltd). ECM, 25-30 mg dry weight, was digested using 0.1 mg/ml proteinase K with 10 mM Tris (pH 8.0, 50 mM NaCl, and 1 mM EDTA) for 24 h at 50°C. Digested samples were then assayed following the manufacturer’s protocol. Each assay was performed in triplicate.

Scanning electron microscopy analysis

For groups A, B1, B2, muscle tissue was fixed in 4% paraformaldehyde for 45 min at room temperature and subsequently dehydrated using a graded ethanol series. Samples were then snap-frozen in liquid nitrogen and broken into three slices (2 mm thickness), transverse to the direction of fibers, and lyophilized. Lyophilized muscle slices were sputter-coated with gold using an Emitech K575 Sputter Coater (EM Technologies, Kent, UK) and examined using a Philips XL30 Scanning Electron Microscope (Philips-FEI, Eindhoven, The Netherlands).

Biomechanical test

Uniaxial tensile test was performed to determine the stress-strain response of the native and decellularized muscle. Control, B1, and B2 group samples were cut by surgical scissors along its line of axis (longitudinal direction) into 20 × 2 mm with a gauge length of 5 mm. The thickness of the test sample was recorded. The samples, set to their natural (no-load) length, were mounted on custom-made jaw holder on the displacement controlled tensile testing machine with a 500 lb load cell (self-assembly mini-MTS, 0.1 lb resolution), while submerged in a plexiglass cylinder that was filled with saline solution at room temperature. Preconditioning was performed to a maximum force of 10% of the break strength over five cycles and the sections were then tested to failure at a strain rate of 0.5 mm/min. The tangent modulus and failure strength/strain were recorded.

Implantation

Bilateral LD muscle defects of approximately 2 × 1 cm2 in size were created in six mice under anesthesia. We then harvested another 12 pieces of mouse LD muscle for decellularization. Decellularized ECM specimens of LD muscle for groups B1 and B2, were then studied. Six specimens were bilaterally implanted in situ in three mice in each group. The matrix patch was placed at the defect site, fixed, and immobilized with interrupted 6-0 silk sutures at the insertion of the muscle. The back wound was irrigated with normal saline and approximated with 3-0 nylon. The mice were sacrificed and muscle samples were retrieved on days 10, 20, and 30 after surgery. The sample sections were examined for the inflammatory reaction at the matrix-native muscle interface and the inflammatory cell profile by H&E and immunohistochemical staining.

Statistical analysis

All results were evaluated using a two-tailed Student’s t-test (SPSS15.0, AsianAnalytics, Taipei, Taiwan) and are presented as mean ± S.E. A p<0.05 was regarded as statistically significant.

RESULTS

Histological evaluation of decellularized matrices and DNA quantification

Histological staining of tissue sections was performed to evaluate the efficiency of decellularization. In fresh-frozen control tissues, intense cellular remnants, particularly nuclear materials, were clearly seen in H&E-, Van Gieson’s-, and DAPI-stained sections (Figs. 1a, f, and k). The treatment groups of B1, B2, C, and D all demonstrated a depletion of recognizable cell components compared to control group in H&E staining (Figs. 1b-e). The clearance of nuclear components was further evident in Dapi staining (Figs. 1l-o). In the Van Gieson’s staining, the extracellular structure of muscle tissue in group B1 and B2 was comparable to the controls while there was mainly fibrous structure preserved in the groups C and D. Figure 2 shows that the DNA contents in the decellularized ECMs was significantly reduced from 1.40 ± 0.11 μg/mg dry weight in untreated muscle to 0.11 ± 0.01, 0.09 ± 0.01, 0.19 ± 0.02, and 0.06 ± 0.02 μg/mg dry weight in groups B1, B2, C, and D, respectively, where p<0.05 compared to the native control for all cases.

Photomicrographs of hematoxylin and eosin (H&E)-stained (100×), VerHoff Van Gieson’s-stained (100×) and DAPI-stained (400×) histological sections of a muscle before and after decellularization. a-e): hematoxylin and eosin; f-j): VerHoff Van Gieson; k-o) Dapi. Groups - a, f, and k) Control; b, g, and l) Triton, 1 week (group B1); c, h, and m) Triton, 2 weeks (group B2); d, i, and n) SDS 1 week (group C); e, j, and o) Triton 1 week + SDS 1 week (group D).

DNA quantification of groups A, B1, B2, C, and D.

Collagen and glycosaminoglycan (GAG) content

Figure 3a shows that the collagen contents of the decellularized specimens treated with Triton X-100 for one week and two weeks (B1: 3.13 ± 0.15 μg/mg dry weight, B2: 2.99 ± 0.34 μg/mg dry weight) were comparable to control group (3.07 ± 0.13 μg/mg dry weight) but were significantly reduced in groups C and D. (C: 2.12 ± 0.30 μg/mg dry weight, D: 2.25 ± 0.07 μg/mg dry weight, p<0.05). Total GAG content significantly decreased from 3.98 ± 0.18 μg/mg dry weight in control group to 2.37 ± 0.18, 2.48 ± 0.32, 2.02 ± 0.26 and 2.09 ± 0.38 μg/mg dry weight in group B1, B2, C, and D, respectively (Fig. 3b).

a) Collagen content in the native muscle tissue (group A) and in the decellularized matrix (B1, B2, C, and D); b) GAG content in the native muscle tissue (group A) and in the decellularized matrix (B1, B2, C, and D).

Scanning electron microscopy

Scanning electron microscopy (SEM) images obtained from groups A, B1, and B2 showed that, unlike untreated muscle which showed a densely packed structure, the decellularized muscles exhibited a clear fibrous structure with no cells observed between the fibrils. The thicker wavy fiber bundles are believed to represent collagen interwoven with more slender elastic fibers to form a porous network (Fig. 4).

Scanning electron micrographs of native and decellularized matrix: a) group A (native); b) group B1; c) group B2.

Biomechanical test

The uniaxial tensile test showed there was no significant difference in the tangent modulus between groups A, B1, and B2 (0.6 ± 0.01 MPa, 0.63 ± 0.01 MPa and 0.52 ± 0.03 MPa, p>0.05). The failure strength was close in group A, B1, and B2 (0.631 ± 0.04, 0.627 ± 0.06, 0.581 ± 0.09 MPa, respectively; p>0.05). The extensibility was larger in group B2 (failure strain 1.14), compared to groups A (0.91) and B1 (0.91) but there was no significant difference (Fig. 5). The mechanical properties of the decellularized ECM of groups C and D were not tested because of the apparent damage of the ECM structure.

Uniaxial tensile test of native and decellularized matrix:a) group A (native); b) group B1; c) group B2.

Implantation

Figures 6a-c illustrate the harvesting of the LD muscle, the decellularized matrix, and the implanted tissue. The H&E staining micrographs of implanted matrix in group B1 retrieved at 10, 20, and 30 days postoperatively are shown in Figures 7a, b, and c, respectively. Moreover, H&E staining micrographs for group B2 are shown in Figures 7e, f, and g. Inflammatory cells, composed of mononuclear cells and multinucleated foreign-body giant cells, were seen infiltrating mainly the acellular tissues in the Triton X-100 one-week and two-week treatment groups. There was no integration between the acellular matrix and native muscle tissue at the interface. The layer of inflammatory cells decreased in thickness at 20 days after surgery, and the depth of the inflammatory cell infiltration into the outer layers of the native muscle tissue was greater than that observed at ten days after surgery. Neither fibroblasts nor neocollagen fibrils were observed at the interface. Integration between acellular matrix and underlying muscle tissue with neocollagen fibril formation was identified at 30 days after surgery. Obvious infiltration of inflammatory cells was noted in the group treated with Triton X-100 for two weeks, but no myofibril formation was seen. The amount profile of inflammatory cell in group B2 is presented in the Figure 8. The neurtrophils were the primary inflammatory cells at day 10, followed by histiocytes and lymphocytes. After 30 days, the lymphocytes replaced the neutrophils as the major inflammatory cells at the interface of decellularized matrix and native muscle. Immunohistochemical staining indicated positive results for CD 68 macrophages in both the Triton X-100 one-week (Fig. 7d) and two-week (Fig. 7h) treatment groups at 10 days after surgery. However, the number of CD 68 macrophages gradually decreased until day 30.

Gross appearance of decellularized muscle matrix and implantation surgery: a) Lower left: harvesting of the native LD muscle; b) Upper: decellularized muscle matrix (bar: 1 cm); c) Lower right: implantation of muscle matrix (dark line: border).

H&E staining and immunostaining micrographs of implants 10, 20, and 30 days after surgery: a, b, c) Micrographs of H&E staining of group B1 10, 20, and 30 days after surgery; e, f, g) Micrographs of H&E staining of group B2 10, 20, and 30 days after surgery; d) Immunostaining micrographs of group B1 (CD68, arrow); h) Immunostaining micrographs of group B2 (CD68, arrow); (a, e: 200×; b, c, f, g: 100×; d, h: 100×).

Inflammatory cell profile after implantation (group B2; counting the major inflammatory cells including neutrophils, histiocytes, and lymphocytes under high-power field 200×).

DISCUSSION

Several types of natural scaffolds, such as porcine small intestinal submucosa, acellular dermal matrix, and collagen, are currently used to repair abdominal wall defects in different animal models (5, 6, 20, 21, 28, 29). Among these, acellular matrices obtained by detergent-enzymatic methods have great potential for tissue regeneration, because many of the primary molecular structures of ECM are highly conserved among various species, and the immunogenic response of the host tissue is therefore expected to be low (3, 10). Ueda et al used gel electrophoresis (SDS-PAGE) to demonstrate the complete antigen clearing from the porcine heart valve by combination treatment with SDS and Triton X-100 (10). Gilbert et al showed that the ECM possesses all the characteristics, including highly ordered and hierarchical organization, favorable for tissue regeneration, and is therefore a good candidate for tissue regeneration (30). The ECM also provides a supportive medium for blood or lymphatic vessels as well as nerves (31).

For the acellular scaffold, the first important issue is to verify the effectiveness of cell removal and the second is to identify the optimal decellularization protocol, according to morphological, biochemical, and mechanical properties that will facilitate the appropriate differentiation and maturation of myoblasts for the formation of myotubes and myofibers. Zhang et al showed 93% of DNA clearance ratio by using 0.05% trypsin and 1% Triton X-100 (32). The method of Gillies (latrunculin B, hypertonic saline solution, and DNase I) achieved 96% DNA clearance ratio of mouse tibialis anterior muscle; however, when he repeated the method of Stern et al (0.05% trypsin 1 h + Triton X-100 5 days), only about 42% (from 2.92 ± 0.14 to 1.71 ± 0.17 μg/mg dry weight) of the nuclear components was removed (27, 33). The efficiency of trypsin and Triton X-100 on cell removal is mixed (30, 34-35-36-37-38). Effective cell removal (3.0 ± 0.4% residual DNA content) with Triton X-100 for pericardium decellularization has been reported by Mendoza-Novelo et al (39). Also, SDS is regarded as very effective for cell removal (30). Woods et al found that for the cell nuclei removal of porcine bone and anterior cruciate ligament, Triton X-100-SDS treatment was more effective than those of Triton-Triton or Triton-TnBP (tributyl phosphate) treatments (37). In our study, DNA clearance ratios of 92.2%, 93.3%, 86.4%, 95.7% in groups B1, B2, C, and D, respectively, can be achieved. Among them, treatments by trypsin + Triton X-100 (groups B1 and B2) and Triton X-100-SDS (group D) seemed to be more effective in cellular component removal in mouse skeletal muscle. The SEM findings in groups B1 and B2 indicate the presence of gaps between fibrous bundles in decellularized ECM of approximately 5 μm to 10 μm in size, which is suitable for cell adhesion and migration. It is unlikely that any specific combination of reagents will be suitable for the 100% removal of all cell components from different tissues. A previous study suggested that an ECM with most or all of the visible cellular material removed is safe for implantation (40).

The collagen content of a decellularized matrix in the trypsin-Triton X-100 groups (groups B1 and B2) is nearly completely preserved compared to an approximate 27% to 31% reduction in the trypsin-SDS group (group C) and the trypsin-Triton X-100-SDS group (group D). The preservation of collagen content in the trypsin-Triton X-100 groups is consistent with our SEM observation, which reveals intact collagen bundles. Schenke-Laylanda et al found prolonged exposure with trypsin/EDTA did not affect the collagen content in a decellularized heart valve (30, 35). Woods et al revealed Triton X-100 had no effect on the collagen content of an ECM obtained from the anterior cruciate ligament (30, 37). As for the effect of SDS, some have suggested that SDS treatment tends to cause the loss of collagen integrity but not the collagen content (30, 35) For the pericardium, it has been shown that decellularization with SDS causes irreversible swelling and denaturation compared to native tissue (41, 42).

Different from the collagen content, we observed substantial reduction (~28-47%) in the GAG content for all of the four groups of decellularized matrix. The decrease in GAG content may be due to the removal of GAGs associated with cell membrane. It has been reported that approximately 30% of GAGs are associated with cell membranes (30). Therefore, it is likely that these GAGs may be removed along with the disruption of sarcolemma and cell membrane during the decellularization process (30). Many experimental results have indicated that prolonged exposure to trypsin/EDTA may cause the decrease in GAG content (30, 34, 35). Nevertheless, the effects of Triton X-100 on the GAG content of a decellularized ECM is indefinite (30, 36-37-38). Mendoza-Novelo et al showed that the GAGs content in a decellularized pericardium treated by Triton X-100 is about 40% lower than native tissue (39). However, there was no difference in the sulfated GAG content in the ACL after treatment with Triton X-100 for four days (37). Previous literature suggests that SDS treatment tends to cause a decrease in GAG content (30, 35). Disparate results have been observed by using the same reagents in various tissues, such as porcine heart valves, pericardial tissue, liver or adipose tissues (10, 31, 35, 43, 44, 45).

The present mechanical tests show that the mechanical properties, including tangent modulus, failure stress and strain, of the decellularized ECM in groups B1 and B2 are very similar to the mechanical properties of the native tissue. Qing et al revealed results showing no significant difference in maximal breaking load and maximal extensional displacement between control and decellularized groups (26). Gillies also found that the stress values for strain of 10% to 100% and tangent modulus at 100% strain were not significantly different between untreated and decellularized samples (27). However, prolonged exposure to trypsin/EDTA may cause a decrease in tensile strength up to 50% (30, 34, 35). Mendoza-Novelo et al suggested the decrease in GAG content of the Triton X-100 decellularized pericardium was related to the changes of its tensile properties (39). Decrease in tensile strength of pericardium after the treatment with SDS was noted (41, 42).

To test the biocompatibility, we implanted group B1 and B2 acellular matrices into the back of ICR mice. Despite the thorough removal of cellular components and nuclear materials, there was an innate inflammatory reaction, particularly a mononuclear response. In addition, immunohistochemical staining for CD 68 yielded positive results at the incipient stage (10 days after surgery). Since the M1 and M2 phenotype profile was associated with chronic inflammation and constructive remodeling (46), respectively, the gradual decrease in M1 macrophages in the earlier stage may indicate the initiation of tissue remodeling.

This study is a preliminary evaluation of the effects of enzyme-detergent treatment on the compositional and structural properties of decellularized muscle tissue. Implantation tests for the decellularized ECM treated with trypsin-Triton X-100 showed mild inflammatory reaction in the short-term period of 30 days as compared to other studies. However, the current study has certain limitations. It lacked a detail characterization of durability and remodeling, including muscle regeneration, angiogenesis, and nerve innervation. Furthermore, a successful regeneration will require ingrowth of the right cell types and our attention will focus on seeding stem cell on the matrix in future studies.

Disclosures

Financial Support: None.
References
  • 1. Chen XK.,Walters TJ. Muscle-derived decellularised extracellular matrix improves functional recovery in a rat latissimus dorsi muscle defect model. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg 2013; 66: 1750-1758
  • 2. Gamba PG.,Conconi MT.,Lo Piccolo R.,Zara G.,Spinazzi R.,Parnigotto PP. Experimental abdominal wall defect repaired with acellular matrix. Pediatr Surg Int 2002; 18: 327-331
  • 3. Conconi MT.,De Coppi P.,Bellini S. Homologous muscle acellular matrix seeded with autologous myoblasts as a tissue-engineering approach to abdominal wall-defect repair. Biomaterials 2005; 26: 2567-2574
  • 4. Okano T.,Matsuda T. Muscular tissue engineering: capillary-incorporated hybrid muscular tissues in vivo tissue culture. Cell Transplant 1998; 7: 435-442
  • 5. Boldrin L.,Malerba A.,Vitiello L. Efficient delivery of human single fiber-derived muscle precursor cells via biocompatible scaffold. Cell Transplant 2008; 17: 577-584
  • 6. van Wachem PB.,Brouwer LA.,van Luyn MJ. Absence of muscle regeneration after implantation of a collagen matrix seeded with myoblasts. Biomaterials 1999; 20: 419-426
  • 7. Turner NJ.,Kielty CM.,Walker MG.,Canfield AE. A novel hyaluronan-based biomaterial (Hyaff-11) as a scaffold for endothelial cells in tissue engineered vascular grafts. Biomaterials 2004; 25: 5955-5964
  • 8. Jenkins SD.,Klamer TW.,Parteka JJ.,Condon RE. A comparison of prosthetic materials used to repair abdominal wall defects. Surgery 1983; 94: 392-398
  • 9. Meddings RN.,Carachi R.,Gorham S.,French DA. A new bioprosthesis in large abdominal wall defects. J Pediatr Surg 1993; 28: 660-663
  • 10. Ueda Y.,Torrianni MW.,Coppin CM.,Iwai S.,Sawa Y.,Matsuda H. Antigen clearing from porcine heart valves with preservation of structural integrity. Int J Artif Organs 2006; 29: 781-789
  • 11. Yang B.,Zhang Y.,Zhou L. Development of a porcine bladder acellular matrix with well-preserved extracellular bioactive factors for tissue engineering. Tissue Eng Part C Methods 2010; 16: 1201-1211
  • 12. Bolland F.,Korossis S.,Wilshaw SP. Development and characterisation of a full-thickness acellular porcine bladder matrix for tissue engineering. Biomaterials 2007; 28: 1061-1070
  • 13. Badylak SF. Xenogeneic extracellular matrix as a scaffold for tissue reconstruction. Transpl Immunol 2004; 12: 367-377
  • 14. el-Kassaby A.,AbouShwareb T.,Atala A. Randomized comparative study between buccal mucosal and acellular bladder matrix grafts in complex anterior urethral strictures. J Urol 2008; 179: 1432-1436
  • 15. Zang M.,Zhang Q.,Chang EI.,Mathur AB.,Yu P. Decellularized tracheal matrix scaffold for tissue engineering. Plast Reconstr Surg 2012; 130: 532-540
  • 16. Liu XL.,Arai T.,Sondell M.,Lundborg G.,Kanje M.,Dahlin LB. Use of chemically extracted muscle grafts to repair extended nerve defects in rats. Scand J Plast Reconstr Surg Hand Surg 2001; 35: 337-345
  • 17. Borschel GH.,Dennis RG.,Kuzon WM. Contractile skeletal muscle tissue-engineered on an acellular scaffold. Plast Reconstr Surg 2004; 113: 595-602
  • 18. Borschel GH.,Dow DE.,Dennis RG.,Brown DL. Tissue-engineered axially vascularized contractile skeletal muscle. Plast Reconstr Surg 2006; 117: 2235-2242
  • 19. De Coppi P.,Bellini S.,Conconi MT. Myoblast-acellular skeletal muscle matrix constructs guarantee a long-term repair of experimental full-thickness abdominal wall defects. Tissue Eng 2006; 12: 1929-1936
  • 20. Turner NJ.,Yates AJ.,Weber DJ. Xenogeneic extracellular matrix as an inductive scaffold for regeneration of a functioning musculotendinous junction. Tissue Eng Part A 2010; 16: 3309-3317
  • 21. Valentin JE.,Turner NJ.,Gilbert TW.,Badylak SF. Functional skeletal muscle formation with a biologic scaffold. Biomaterials 2010; 31: 7475-7484
  • 22. Merritt EK.,Hammers DW.,Tierney M.,Suggs LJ.,Walters TJ.,Farrar RP. Functional assessment of skeletal muscle regeneration utilizing homologous extracellular matrix as scaffolding. Tissue Eng Part A 2010; 16: 1395-1405
  • 23. Machingal MA.,Corona BT.,Walters TJ. A tissue-engineered muscle repair construct for functional restoration of an irrecoverable muscle injury in a murine model. Tissue Eng Part A 2011; 17: 2291-2303
  • 24. Daly KA.,Wolf M.,Johnson SA.,Badylak SF. A rabbit model of peripheral compartment syndrome with associated rhabdomyolysis and a regenerative medicine approach for treatment. Tissue Eng Part C Methods 2011; 17: 631-640
  • 25. Di Benedetto G.,Zura G.,Mazzucchelli R.,Santinelli A.,Scarpelli M.,Bertani A. Nerve regeneration through a combined autologous conduit (vein plus acellular muscle grafts). Biomaterials 1998; 19: 173-181
  • 26. Qing Q.,Qin T. [Optimal method for rat skeletal muscle decellularization] [Article in Chinese]. Zhongguo Xiu Fu Chong Jian Wai Ke Za Zhi 2009; 23: 836-839
  • 27. Gillies AR.,Smith LR.,Lieber RL.,Varghese S. Method for decellularizing skeletal muscle without detergents or proteolytic enzymes. Tissue Eng Part C Methods 2011; 17: 383-389
  • 28. Espinosa-de-los-Monteros A.,de la Torre JI.,Marrero I.,Andrades P.,Davis MR.,Vásconez LO. Utilization of human cadaveric acellular dermis for abdominal hernia reconstruction. Ann Plast Surg 2007; 58: 264-267
  • 29. Zhong T.,Janis JE.,Ahmad J.,Hofer SO. Outcomes after abdominal wall reconstruction using acellular dermal matrix: a systematic review. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg 2011; 64: 1562-1571
  • 30. Gilbert TW.,Sellaro TL.,Badylak SF. Decellularization of tissues and organs. Biomaterials 2006; 27: 3675-3683
  • 31. Brown BN.,Freund JM.,Han L. Comparison of three methods for the derivation of a biologic scaffold composed of adipose tissue extracellular matrix. Tissue Eng Part C Methods 2011; 17: 411-421
  • 32. Zhang Y.,He Y.,Bharadwaj S. Tissue-specific extracellular matrix coatings for the promotion of cell proliferation and maintenance of cell phenotype. Biomaterials 2009; 30: 4021-4028
  • 33. Stern MM.,Myers RL.,Hammam N. The influence of extracellular matrix derived from skeletal muscle tissue on the proliferation and differentiation of myogenic progenitor cells ex vivo. Biomaterials 2009; 30: 2393-2399
  • 34. Grauss RW.,Hazekamp MG.,Oppenhuizen F.,van Munsteren CJ.,Gittenberger-de Groot AC.,DeRuiter MC. Histological evaluation of decellularised porcine aortic valves: matrix changes due to different decellularisation methods. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 2005; 27: 566-571
  • 35. Schenke-Layland K.,Vasilevski O.,Opitz F. Impact of decellularization of xenogeneic tissue on extracellular matrix integrity for tissue engineering of heart valves. J Struct Biol 2003; 143: 201-208
  • 36. Cartmell JS.,Dunn MG. Effect of chemical treatments on tendon cellularity and mechanical properties. J Biomed Mater Res 2000; 49: 134-140
  • 37. Woods T.,Gratzer PF. Effectiveness of three extraction techniques in the development of a decellularized bone-anterior cruciate ligament-bone graft. Biomaterials 2005; 26: 7339-7349
  • 38. Lin P.,Chan WC.,Badylak SF.,Bhatia SN. Assessing porcine liver-derived biomatrix for hepatic tissue engineering. Tissue Eng 2004; 10: 1046-1053
  • 39. Mendoza-Novelo B.,Avila EE.,Cauich-Rodríguez JV. Decellularization of pericardial tissue and its impact on tensile viscoelasticity and glycosaminoglycan content. Acta Biomater 2011; 7: 1241-1248
  • 40. Gilbert TW.,Freund JM.,Badylak SF. Quantification of DNA in biologic scaffold materials. J Surg Res 2009; 152: 135-139
  • 41. Courtman DW.,Pereira CA.,Kashef V.,McComb D.,Lee JM.,Wilson GJ. Development of a pericardial acellular matrix biomaterial: biochemical and mechanical effects of cell extraction. J Biomed Mater Res 1994; 28: 655-666
  • 42. Mendoza-Novelo B.,Cauich-Rodríguez JV. The effect of surfactants, crosslinking agents and L-cysteine on the stabilization and mechanical properties of bovine pericardium. J Appl Biomater Biomech 2009; 7: 123-131
  • 43. Kasimir MT.,Rieder E.,Seebacher G. Comparison of different decellularization procedures of porcine heart valves. Int J Artif Organs 2003; 26: 421-427
  • 44. Zhou J.,Fritze O.,Schleicher M. Impact of heart valve decellularization on 3-D ultrastructure, immunogenicity and thrombogenicity. Biomaterials 2010; 31: 2549-2554
  • 45. Liao H.,Zhou GQ. Development and progress of engineering of skeletal muscle tissue. Tissue Eng Part B Rev 2009; 15: 319-331
  • 46. Badylak SF.,Gilbert TW. Immune response to biologic scaffold materials. Semin Immunol 2008; 20: 109-116

Authors

  • Lin, Chih-Hsun [PubMed] [Google Scholar] 1, 2
  • Yang, Jenn-Rong [PubMed] [Google Scholar] 3
  • Chiang, Nai-Jung [PubMed] [Google Scholar] 4
  • Ma, Hsu [PubMed] [Google Scholar] 1
  • Tsay, Ruey-Yug [PubMed] [Google Scholar] 2, * Corresponding Author ([email protected])

Affiliations

  • Taipei Veterans General Hospital, Department of Surgery, Division of Plastic Surgery, Taipei - Taiwan
  • Institute of Biomedical Engineering, National Yang-Ming University, Taipei - Taiwan
  • Division of Physiology, Livestock Research Institute, Council of Agriculture, Tainan - Taiwan
  • National Institute of Cancer Research, National Health Research Institutes, Tainan - Taiwan

Article usage statistics

The blue line displays unique views in the time frame indicated.
The yellow line displays unique downloads.
Views and downloads are counted only once per session.

No supplementary material is available for this article.