Advertisement

Tibial revision knee arthroplasty: influence of modular stems on implant fixation and bone flexibility in AORI Type T2a defects

Abstract

Background

Due to the varying bone defects presented to surgeons during revision total knee arthroplasty, modular implant systems are preferred over standard implant designs. However, every implant combination (sleeves, stems and augments) can affect the fixation in different ways and thus influence the long-term outcome. We therefore aimed to analyze the effect of large metaphyseal sleeves with and without short modular stems on implant fixation and bone flexibility of a modular tibial revision knee system.

Methods

A new tibial revision implant (Attune RP Revision; DePuy Synthes) with a sleeve was compared to a sleeve/stem combination implanted in synthetic bones with Anderson Orthopaedic Research Institute (AORI) Type T2a defects and also compared to an intact bone. Implant-bone-interface micromotions and bone deformations during standardized load application were measured using a digital image correlation system.

Results

The lowest relative micromotions were measured more distally for stemmed implants, and more proximally for the stemless group. When compared to an intact bone, there is increased proximal bone deformation in the stemless group.

Conclusions

Using a short stem in addition to a tibial revision implant with a metaphyseal sleeve in a moderate bone defect provides for more natural bone deformation. Although the main fixation area was shifted distally, relative micromotions were reduced. Based on this biomechanical study, the use of diaphyseal short stems with metaphyseal sleeves seems to be beneficial in terms of the initial implant fixation and for its flexibility, which is similar to that of intact bones in the case of AORI T2a defects.

Int J Artif Organs 2016; 39(10): 534 - 540

Article Type: ORIGINAL RESEARCH ARTICLE

DOI:10.5301/ijao.5000530

Authors

Jan Nadorf, Simone Gantz, Konner Kohl, Jan P. Kretzer

Article History

Disclosures

Financial support: The work was partly funded by DePuy Synthes. The institution (Center for Orthopedics and Trauma Surgery, University Hospital Heidelberg) of the authors J.N., S.G., K.K. and J.P.K. received the funding. The funding party had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.
Conflict of interest: None of the authors has financial interest related to this study to disclose.

This article is available as full text PDF.

  • If you are a Subscriber, please log in now.

  • Article price: Eur 36,00
  • You will be granted access to the article for 72 hours and you will be able to download any format (PDF or ePUB). The article will be available in your login area under "My PayPerView". You will need to register a new account (unless you already own an account with this journal), and you will be guided through our online shop. Online purchases are paid by Credit Card through PayPal.
  • If you are not a Subscriber you may:
  • Subscribe to this journal
  • Unlimited access to all our archives, 24 hour a day, every day of the week.

Authors

  • Nadorf, Jan [PubMed] [Google Scholar] 1, * Corresponding Author ([email protected])
  • Gantz, Simone [PubMed] [Google Scholar] 2
  • Kohl, Konner [PubMed] [Google Scholar] 1
  • Kretzer, Jan P. [PubMed] [Google Scholar] 1

Affiliations

  • Laboratory of Biomechanics and Implant Research, Center of Orthopedics and Traumatology, University Hospital Heidelberg, Heidelberg - Germany
  • Biometric Consulting and Project Management, Center of Orthopedics and Traumatology, University Hospital Heidelberg, Heidelberg - Germany

Article usage statistics

The blue line displays unique views in the time frame indicated.
The yellow line displays unique downloads.
Views and downloads are counted only once per session.

No supplementary material is available for this article.